Good article

I have just read a good article written by the wonderful historian, Dr. Bill Leonard.  He was the first church history professor I had at Southern Seminary in Louisville, KY.  He ignited a love for history in me.  In the article, he uses a historical look to see how we have "used" the scripture over the years.  It can be very difficult to read this kind of article and think, "Have I done that?"  Check it out:

                Opinion: The Bible Tells Me. So?
                  by Bill Leonard, Thursday, March 15, 2012
 I have had a number of questions recently about the bible, especially the Old Testament and how we can understand some of the things that do not seem to add up to God being like Jesus.  God seems so violent, Jesus brings peace.  God seems so distant, Jesus walks and talks with us (in the garden of course).  God seems to play favorites, Jesus invites anyone and everyone to come follow him. 

I have heard of two instances just this week where people feel that reading their bible has actually shaken their faith in God.  I would say that it is not God or the Bible that is ultimately shaking our faith, but how people have historically applied God's word in such abusive ways.  Then, even if we do not think we are doing it, we read the scripture through that understanding or that lens and it is very hard to actually see God being that way.  Especially if we see Jesus as the ultimate revelation of God.  Can you see Jesus ordering his disciples to kill every man, woman, child, and animal in a city just because they were not the chosen ones?  No!  When the disciples James and John wanted to rain down judgement on a Samaritan town just for not showing hospitality, Jesus rebuked them.

I have recently been reading Cecil Sherman's autobiography, By My Own Reckoning.  In it, he tells his life story, which is very linked to the fundamentalist takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention.  The fundamentalists said they were defending the inerrancy of the bible.  The SBC formed a peace committee and put Cecil on it with fundamentalists like Adrian Rogers.  Here is a quote from page 189 of the book:

    Once when discussing the Bible in a morning session (of the Peace Committee), Adrian Rogers said, "I take the Bible literally.  I know there are places in the Bible that use figurative language such as 'the land flowed with milk and hone', but I always try to take the Bible literally."  That afternoon I was in the company of Adrian Rogers and Jerry Vines.  I referenced Adrian's statement about taking the Bible literally, and asked, "What do you do with those places in the New Testament that affirm slavery, like 1 Peter, Ephesians, and Colossians?"  He hesitated a moment then said, "Well, I believe slavery is a much maligned institution; if we had slavery today, we would not have this welfare mess."  I had never heard anyone speak a good word for slavery; I went upstairs and wrote it down.  Rogers was saying he believed slaves should be obedient to their masters just as he believed wives should be obedient to their husbands.  Such was the biblical literalism of the people who controlled the Peace Committee.  No other issue was half as important as the inerrancy of the Bible. (italics added)

 It hurts me a great deal to realize that so many people over the course of history have tried to defend the faith and the Bible, but have caused so much pain and hurt in the name of a God that calls us all to him for true salvation, in this life and beyond.  It must be a grave sin to build such stumbling blocks.  It makes me shiver with the thought that I might be doing that at times too.

God be with you in the Journey!
Kevin